Understanding Our Unseen Reality.

For what it's worth, I don't agree with the quantum mechanical TI conclusion of the non-existence of time. Entanglement between two paired fermions (or other particles) has always been shown to exhibit characteristics and produce effects independent of time. Just because an event is observed to occur under conditions of simultaneity, that in no way is a proof of the non-existence of measured temporal change (i.e. time). Before I go on, let me say that two non-entangled particles/photons can never be observed to interact with their respectively entangled particles at the same 'time'. There are well known thought experiments that deal with this and I leave it to the more interested reader to seek them out. But also as in mathematics and in the physical world, it can be shown that there is no such thing as a defined point in space (we have no absolute frame of reference by which to establish a given point in space), and the same is true for 'time' except that there was this event called 'singularity' that technical professionals believe brought forth all things related to time, space, matter, and energy. And given the fact that it's impossible to have a defined point in space, and also time (Einstein's GTR), we establish what are called 'agreements' so to speak, that are nothing more that commonly shared assumptions to model change (time) in a given venue (space) in order to accurately predict the behavior of matter and energy. And so I disagree with QM interpretations that show there is no such thing as 'time' because of the results of observing a quantum entangled pair. The author may be correct at the quantum level, but that's only ever going to be true when the gravitational wavelength is less than or equal to the quantum wavelength; And we live in that world how? I firmly believe our world is shaped in no small part by consciousness, I suggest for further reading: Founding Quantum Theory On The Basis Of Consciousness by Dr. Efstratios Manousakis Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4350, U.S.A and Department of Physics, University of Athens, Athens, 15784, Greece. email: stratos@martech.fsu.edu. This citation is a few years old, and I apologize in advance if it has changed. So, for my own 2 cent's worth, I don't think the conclusions of TI in QM that time is non existent - even at the quantum level, nor does time behave arbitrarily. Thoughts?

For what it's worth, I don't agree with the quantum mechanical TI conclusion of the non-existence of time. Entanglement between two paired fermions (or other particles) has always been shown to exhibit characteristics and produce effects independent of time. Just because an event is observed to occur under conditions of simultaneity, that in no way is a proof of the non-existence of measured temporal change (i.e. time). Before I go on, let me say that two non-entangled particles/photons can never be observed to interact with their respectively entangled particles at the same 'time'. There are well known thought experiments that deal with this and I leave it to the more interested reader to seek them out. But also as in mathematics and in the physical world, it can be shown that there is no such thing as a defined point in space (we have no absolute frame of reference by which to establish a given point in space), and the same is true for 'time' except that there was this event called 'singularity' that technical professionals believe brought forth all things related to time, space, matter, and energy. And given the fact that it's impossible to have a defined point in space, and also time (Einstein's GTR), we establish what are called 'agreements' so to speak, that are nothing more that commonly shared assumptions to model change (time) in a given venue (space) in order to accurately predict the behavior of matter and energy. And so I disagree with QM interpretations that show there is no such thing as 'time' because of the results of observing a quantum entangled pair. The author may be correct at the quantum level, but that's only ever going to be true when the gravitational wavelength is less than or equal to the quantum wavelength; And we live in that world how? I firmly believe our world is shaped in no small part by consciousness, I suggest for further reading: Founding Quantum Theory On The Basis Of Consciousness by Dr. Efstratios Manousakis Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4350, U.S.A and Department of Physics, University of Athens, Athens, 15784, Greece. email: stratos@martech.fsu.edu. This citation is a few years old, and I apologize in advance if it has changed. So, for my own 2 cent's worth, I don't think the conclusions of TI in QM that time is non existent - even at the quantum level, nor does time behave arbitrarily. Thoughts?

For what it's worth, I don't agree with the quantum mechanical TI conclusion of the non-existence of time. Entanglement between two paired fermions (or other particles) has always been shown to exhibit characteristics and produce effects independent of time. Just because an event is observed to occur under conditions of simultaneity, that in no way is a proof of the non-existence of measured temporal change (i.e. time). Before I go on, let me say that two non-entangled particles/photons can never be observed to interact with their respectively entangled particles at the same 'time'. There are well known thought experiments that deal with this and I leave it to the more interested reader to seek them out. But also as in mathematics and in the physical world, it can be shown that there is no such thing as a defined point in space (we have no absolute frame of reference by which to establish a given point in space), and the same is true for 'time' except that there was this event called 'singularity' that technical professionals believe brought forth all things related to time, space, matter, and energy. And given the fact that it's impossible to have a defined point in space, and also time (Einstein's GTR), we establish what are called 'agreements' so to speak, that are nothing more that commonly shared assumptions to model change (time) in a given venue (space) in order to accurately predict the behavior of matter and energy. And so I disagree with QM interpretations that show there is no such thing as 'time' because of the results of observing a quantum entangled pair. The author may be correct at the quantum level, but that's only ever going to be true when the gravitational wavelength is less than or equal to the quantum wavelength; And we live in that world how? I firmly believe our world is shaped in no small part by consciousness, I suggest for further reading: Founding Quantum Theory On The Basis Of Consciousness by Dr. Efstratios Manousakis Department of Physics, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, 32306-4350, U.S.A and Department of Physics, University of Athens, Athens, 15784, Greece. email: stratos@martech.fsu.edu. This citation is a few years old, and I apologize in advance if it has changed. So, for my own 2 cent's worth, I don't think the conclusions of TI in QM that time is non existent - even at the quantum level, nor does time behave arbitrarily. Thoughts?